News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Estimated 1.56B face masks will have entered oceans in 2020 by yibg on Tuesday December 15, 2020 @03:14PM (#25434585)
how much protection would be enough for you to wear one? 50%? 75%? Hell, even 1% is higher than 0 and really, what's the harm?

Yea most people don't get very sick, except for the 300k that are dead just in the US.

Re:Estimated 1.56B face masks will have entered oceans in 2020 by WhiskeyVictor on Tuesday December 15, 2020 @03:31PM (#25434850)
2020 is coming to a close. In a couple of weeks we will have the final tally for the year. This is good because we can then compare it to other years in total. I suggest you check the all cause excess mortality figure. It's already been projected to be essentially the same. This is a really good metric to evaluate the threat level.

Here's a nice graph of deaths per month per millon for a nearly 200 year perspective: https://swprs.org/facts-about-covid-19/#foobox-1/3/sweden-mo...

Re:Estimated 1.56B face masks will have entered oceans in 2020 by slaw on Tuesday December 15, 2020 @03:51PM (#25435084)
There will be some mortality excess in 2020.

'The observed temporary excess mortality likely arises because people in vulnerable groups die weeks or months earlier than they would otherwise, due to the timing and severity of the unusual external event.' https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.11.20229708v...

Re:Estimated 1.56B face masks will have entered oceans in 2020 by yibg on Tuesday December 15, 2020 @04:16PM (#25435367)
I’m all for data driven decisions. We just need to be more careful to dig into the details of the data. A simple excess mortality figure may not be relevant. Both covid and the lockdowns could have caused increased or decreased mortalities in other areas.

Eg if there was zero excess mortality, that alone doesn’t prove much either way.

Re:Estimated 1.56B face masks will have entered oceans in 2020 by worker767424 on Wednesday December 16, 2020 @02:30AM (#25439996)
I wonder if we would have noticed this before modern hospitals and record keeping. I suspect it would have spread much slower, maybe over a decade. In a village of 1,000, there might be 5 deaths that would have been written off as a bad flu, or whatever people used to call getting sick like that.
Re:Estimated 1.56B face masks will have entered oceans in 2020 by worker767424 on Tuesday December 15, 2020 @04:00PM (#25435200)
> and really, what's the harm?

If people think a mask offers them more protection than it really does, they might engage in riskier behavior.

When I see people out walking around the neighborhood with masks on, I really wonder what they're trying to accomplish. You're not going to get covid walking outdoors passing within 6 feet of someone for 5 seconds.

These days, my theory is more people get infected at home than out in public.

Re:Estimated 1.56B face masks will have entered oceans in 2020 by yibg on Tuesday December 15, 2020 @04:18PM (#25435405)
Judgement is important of course. I wear masks around people but not when I’m driving or outdoors by myself. I think for a lot of people, it’s just easier not to put it on and take it off. For me for instance if I’m out hiking I just put it on and leave it on. Where as my partner will remove it when there is no one around and put it back on when someone is coming close by. I see the same thing with people driving short distances.

People getting infected at home may be a large vector, but the virus got in the home some how in the first place. It’s just easier to spread from that point onwards once it’s in.

Re:Estimated 1.56B face masks will have entered oceans in 2020 by EB-Barrington on Tuesday December 15, 2020 @04:29PM (#25435491)
New York State recently reported that 74% of infections spread between Sept and Nov 2000 took place during household social gatherings (based upon contact tracing data).
Re:Estimated 1.56B face masks will have entered oceans in 2020 by worker767424 on Wednesday December 16, 2020 @02:19AM (#25439936)
> household social gatherings

Also known as pods and bubbles.