Plenty of companies incorporate a hosted Grafana in their product.
A few monitoring platforms too: https://HostedGraphite.com for many years now, and my own https://HostedMetrics.com in the last few years.
1. Your product is integrating multiple tools and data sources to provide value beyond "just grafana".
2. You're are not Amazon, and I think that is actually a big point here. It's unlikely that someone will choose your product over Grafana if they are just looking for a hosted Grafana. I don't think that's really the case with an AWS alternative.
If not you're just speculating that Amazon is acting in an very un-historical-Amazon way.
Down in the Conclusion section at the bottom:
"AWS, working with Grafana Labs, will be contributing licensing revenue and code to help make Grafana even better, not just for the AWS service, but also for open source users and Grafana Cloud customers."
The initial content that I had read indicated that it was Grafana Enterprise licences that would be contributed back.
This is a new step for Amazon, which is good. In this case this feels closer to a first-party AWS Marketplace app for Grafana.
What's the survival rate of Amazon partners?
Same with book prices. Lots of cheap e-books, and then I see "price set by publisher" and its $29.99.
Not only is this taking-and-running an open source project, but on top of that, the pricing is per user? This feels like a step beyond "hosting software for you", and towards "building a business with someone else's product"
I see that this is in partnership with Grafana Labs, which I guess is a good thing, but I can't comprehend why Grafana would have gone along with this (short of some sort of "well we're doing it either way" threat from Amazon).
I don't see anything new here that Amazon is providing on top of what Grafana Labs already did. What am I missing?