Re:Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving fo...
by mamon on Tuesday December 15, 2020 @12:57PM
(#25432866)
Problem is: most governments think of "pro-labor" laws as paid sick or maternity leave, labor unions privileges, or protections from being fired, e.g. mandating longer notice periods. This mostly benefit low wage workers, who lack bargaining power, but the needs of highly paid tech workers (such as no non-competes) go unnoticed.
Re:Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving fo...
by qppo on Tuesday December 15, 2020 @03:45PM
(#25435019)
Comprehensive labor reform could be a solid platform for any state representative or governor that wants to make a run in 2024, and I can see several states taking it on. There are many horses to be traded.
Some things like banning non-competes, personal IP protections, corporate immunity from COVID lawsuits, police union reform, teachers union reform, pension reform, family and sick leave... there are so many things to attach one's name to its mind boggling. And there is wide support for some of these things on both sides of the aisle - and it doesn't touch guns or abortion!
Re:Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving fo...
by api on Tuesday December 15, 2020 @11:00AM
(#25431432)
The fundamental problem is governments making laws to serve existing companies rather than to help create new things that don't exist yet. It's "hold on to what you have" vs creating something new.
Pro-labor is not anti business, quite the opposite here. But it's never understood that way.