News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Instagram's Million Dollar Bug (2015) by ISL on Monday December 14, 2020 @08:26PM (#25425899)
Sounds like a third party might be able to improve the situation by providing escrow.

With their first bugs, researchers are entirely unknown quantities to the company. Stating, "I have a critical zero-day, but I won't tell you what it is until you pay me $BUCKS," clearly won't work.

A reliable escrow service, to whom the researcher can provide the exploit and the company can provide $BUCKS, offers insurance to both parties. If the exploit is not as described, the researcher loses the exploit entirely and gets no $BUCKS, but if the exploit is as described, the company cannot renege on the deal.

(Edit, addressing the direct question more-clearly: perhaps what is necessary to avoid the perception (and reality) of extortion is the emergence of accepted professional understanding for assessing the value of exploits. Without such a system, there will always be a strong incentive pushing people in the direction of blackhat work.)

Re:Instagram's Million Dollar Bug (2015) by sebmellen on Monday December 14, 2020 @08:33PM (#25425962)
AFAIK this is similar to Zerodium's business model, except they sell the zero day exploits to governments [0].

From their website [1]:

> "We pay BIG bounties, not bug bounties"

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zerodium

[1]: https://www.zerodium.com/