News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[dead]
Re:Human Clock by nostromo on Sunday December 13, 2020 @08:16PM (#25412299)
Is this HN satire?
Re:Human Clock by Tade0 on Sunday December 13, 2020 @08:32PM (#25412445)
I choose to believe it is.

Then again I can name at least one person who would unironically agree with what the GP has written.

Re:Human Clock by amanzi on Sunday December 13, 2020 @10:11PM (#25413112)
I can no longer tell the difference. 2020 has ruined me...
Re:Human Clock by 0x008 on Monday December 14, 2020 @03:11AM (#25414640)
Well, I also feel that this year HN discussions are seeing more bickering and more endless discussions where we have seen each side’s arguments a thousand times. The discussions feel a little bit more predictable than pre COVID. Or maybe I just spend more time in the comments...
Re:Human Clock by selfhoster11 on Monday December 14, 2020 @08:35AM (#25417290)
I don't think it's just you. It does feel like the comment section quality has dropped since the lockdown began.
Re:Human Clock by 0x008 on Wednesday December 16, 2020 @05:19AM (#25440930)
I still can’t think of any forum with a higher discussion quality, but people seem less friendly.
Re:Human Clock by kawera on Sunday December 13, 2020 @08:45PM (#25412570)
Must be!
Re:Human Clock by hombre_fatal on Sunday December 13, 2020 @09:16PM (#25412775)
You’re trying to make a joke, but the website could definitely be looked at again with modern expectations. It’s unusable on my iPhone. Even trying to pinch zoom somehow interacts with it. I couldn’t figure out its purpose before I lost interest and closed the tab.

The sarcastic attempt to say “look how amazing this without any modern tools” is out of place when the website isn’t very usable.

Re:Human Clock by systemvoltage on Sunday December 13, 2020 @10:28PM (#25413207)
What bs! The author has no obligation to provide mobile web services ಠ_ಠ.
Re:Human Clock by LordDragonfang on Sunday December 13, 2020 @11:56PM (#25413715)
I honestly can't tell whether this comment is a joke or not. If so, it's not a great one.
Re:Human Clock by Aeolun on Monday December 14, 2020 @12:02AM (#25413745)
The reloading I see on this site is actually super annoying since it resets my zoom level every time, so I, for one, fully agree.
Re:Human Clock by goldenkey on Sunday December 13, 2020 @08:57PM (#25412657)
As a postmodern front-end developer, it is appalling that you attempted to pawn off a classical framework like React to the programmertariat. View frameworks like React and Vue are a waste of CPU cycles and network bandwidth. Not only are they packaged with the application itself, but they also proxy objects (`reactive`) so they can do their hooking. The new way is to compile one's app into an artifact that uses something along the lines of Apple's Clang Automatic Reference Counting to insert re-rendering statements in appropriate areas of the code.

[1] https://svelte.dev/ [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_Reference_Counting

Re:Human Clock by 0x008 on Monday December 14, 2020 @03:07AM (#25414622)
This is a great copypasta.
Re:Human Clock by eliseumds on Sunday December 13, 2020 @08:43PM (#25412551)
Mother of God.
Re:Human Clock by jackconsidine on Sunday December 13, 2020 @08:48PM (#25412594)
A few more points: - Lacking web assembly - Doesn't make use of the new browser-USB spec - No usage of web sockets

I'd agree that this backwards technology stack about invalidates the project? \s

Re:Human Clock by crispyporkbites on Monday December 14, 2020 @02:44AM (#25414511)
Plus there’s no monetisation strategy. Where’s the hustle? I don’t get it.

I’m 19 and get paid 600k (graduated from a boot camp last month), I could build this in a weekend too.

Re:Human Clock by jessebarton on Sunday December 13, 2020 @08:16PM (#25412293)
Nah