keep in mind this is not proven but is a promising angle, CRSPR as made popular is a hijacked mechanism used to edit DNA sequences. normally this mechanism is used in prokaryotic organisms as an immune system. there are tags in the prokaryotes DNA that are used to match with foriegn DNA and signal it for destruction.
this type of arrangement MAY, possibly exist in eukaryotes as well and may be the basis of self/nonself recognition.
i have yet to talk to anyone else in professional context, this is inference on my part but it the best answer i can suggest for now.
you would want to look at antigen presentation and antibody production mechanisms, in deep detail .
Disclaimer: All I know about this comes from Cells at Work/Hataraku Saibou.
So if I understand you correctly, the self-recognition system is something built-in and doesn't change in response to foreign antigens? Or in other words, it's only the recognition of foreign molecules that will change, but this shouldn't affect the production (or culling) of T-cells that are super-sensitive to host's own self-antigens?
PS. And thank you and thanks to others for answering newbie questions on this thread! :)
> So if I understand you correctly, the self-recognition system is something built-in
Yes. before immune cells are released and "primed" they go through a selection process where the receptors they have for (unknown) antigens are tested against a vast array of proteins the body normally produces, if they bind, they are killed off. Sometimes this doesn't work and if they are activated and bind their (self-)antigen when the immune system is activated (i.e. during an infection) they can attack uninfected cells. Which as a one off event is not problematic, the problem comes from the fact that those immune cells stick around when they contact their antigen, and if it is produced by the body this is a lot, and continue to kill healthy cells and cause inflammation.
> and doesn't change in response to foreign antigens?
By the time the immune cells bind to foreign agents they have already gone through the selection process.
Necessarily a vaccine will produce an immune response (or otherwise it won't have the intended effect), this could cause an autoimmune response because the atuoresponsive cells, presumably, have their antigen around.
> but this shouldn't affect the production (or culling) of T-cells that are super-sensitive to host's own self-antigens?
new ones, no. In fact if you're not a child, you aren't producing many new (unique) T-cells at all. Old ones however may proliferate if their antigen is present and an immune response is triggered (to the vaccine or the virus).
If you want real advice, don't take it from some random on the internet with only a minor in biomed, talk to your doctor or immunologist.
the molecular level of the mechanism, beyond the cellular level is detail that needs to be elucidated.
I think the medical guidance has been pretty clear that you should not get the vaccine in this case. There are a lot of people who care more about their own safety than yours who may try to change your mind. Don't listen to them; don't get your medical advice on the internet. Find an expert.
the mRNA of concern will not modify your DNA sequence, the expression of the S protien occurs untill the mRNA is destroyed by the cell, or the cell itself is destroyed taken apart and compared to self antigens, the foriegn antigen is expressed by MHC cells and PresenteD in a context of this is a hostile thing [a wanted poster]
this all occurs in a system of interdependent cell types and thier interactions.
your question addresses the crux of immunology, and needs a lot more attention than would be constructive here.
put on your reading cap and check this out:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immunology
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autoimmune_disease