News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Chrome Is Bad by Blikkentrekker on Saturday December 12, 2020 @03:00PM (#25401111)
I'm quite impressed by that “chromeisbad” as a domain was not already taken.
Re:Chrome Is Bad by codetrotter on Saturday December 12, 2020 @03:13PM (#25401249)
Yeah. After reading your comment I tried out a couple of similar domains on the form x is bad and x is good and they were both parked waiting for someone to pay whatever ridiculous price the owner is wanting to demand to sell it. I wish it was illegal to do that.
Re:Chrome Is Bad by Blikkentrekker on Saturday December 12, 2020 @03:18PM (#25401308)
If it weren't legal, then someone would simply use it for a trivial website and then sell it.

Perhaps that is the only reason this simple, trivial article exists.

Re:Chrome Is Bad by libria on Saturday December 12, 2020 @03:52PM (#25401599)
With the amount of rebuttals in this thread, I'm impressed `chromeisgood.com` isn't taken.
Re:Chrome Is Bad by artiszt on Saturday December 12, 2020 @04:37PM (#25401958)
right

besides, most probably would learn themselves the hard way when put in the same position the OP detailed

problems with Goo are widely known in circles of the Mac-communities ever since Goo-acc's first became avail in the beginning only by invitation, back then

also worth to look into the history of why, when and by whom LS aka LittleSnitch was developed in the first place -- tho this was more related to issues with that then must-go-to site 'versiontracker' [for all sorts of Mac shareware] and a vintaged firewall [3rd party] product widely used that time that didn't work as advertised

a Mac OS w/out LS these days ? back then very few only were concerned with 'calling-/phoning-home' issues on a scale nobody could imagine, least speak or post about in public, in those pre-iPhone ages

Re:Chrome Is Bad by alfon on Saturday December 12, 2020 @05:45PM (#25402509)
Here you have another one: ilovechrome.com :)