It's more like 80% / 20%. The disparity is huge, documented, and factual.
Voter fraud is 100 points for Trump, the Hunter story is 50 points for the Dems, etc..?
The thing is that if you ask side X they’ll say it’s 80/20 for side Y and vice versa. Neither should be so confident that they’re right. And pointing that out is now called bothsidesism. The lengths people go to to avoid cognitive dissonance is beyond ridiculous.
Hillary wasn't perfect. People didn't like her, and we got Trump.
The Weimar Republic was corrupt and ineffective. The Third Reich was corrupt and extremely effective.
Democracy is the history of choosing the least bad. If you consider all bads to be the same, you are not a responsible voter.
Ok, so bothsidesism is justified since you acknowledge both sides are bad?
> If you consider all bads to be the same, you are not a responsible voter.
It’s a strawman to claim both sides are exactly the same level of bad. That’s not what GP was saying.