EU leaders agree to cut emissions by at least 55% by end of decade

Re:EU leaders agree to cut emissions by at least 55% by end ... by oblio on Friday December 11, 2020 @12:02PM (#25387933)

> Directly raising GDP has an indirect, positive net effect on quality of life (not spiritually or philosophically, though, I might argue; although, I only think of these things because I live in an industrialized, developed, “rich” nation).

I don't think you can solve these by fiat.

Governments can only realistically focus on improving the liberty and prosperity of their citizens (you know "life, liberty...).

Happiness is very subjective and I'd say in many cases comes from inside. You could be the richest, most famous and powerful person in the world and still be unhappy.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:EU leaders agree to cut emissions by at least 55% by end ... by blonde_ocean on Tuesday December 22, 2020 @01:23PM (#25509403)

I would argue that raising GDP indirectly allows easier access to clean water, food, solid housing, vaccines, etc. All of those things allow for better quality of life. Where I agree with you is in the spiritual or philosophical sense of “quality of life”—aka happiness or fulfillment. At a certain point, no, money does not increase happiness or fulfillment. But it does increase quality of life.

[ Parent | on HN ]