Re:Cameras and Lenses
by dTal on Thursday December 10, 2020 @09:08AM
(#25373814)
A large lens captures information over an area, and so to a certain extent can "see around" out of focus objects. A selective blur of a fully focused scene captured from a single viewpoint (i.e. a small lens) can only approximate this effect, because it simply doesn't have access to the same information. Even with a perfect depth map, you still don't know what's behind occluded objects.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Cameras and Lenses
by foo_barrio on Thursday December 10, 2020 @11:04AM
(#25375132)
If instead of resolving points of light on the image sensor, you use a group of pixels to resolve an entire tiny image you can effectively also see around things. You end up with a picture of many small sections of the large image each at a different angle. The image on the far left of the image would see a different angle than the image on the far right. This is exactly what the Lytro camera did and it's why you can take the picture first and focus later. Of course you sacrifice overall imagine resolution quite severely:
* https://www.researchgate.net/figure/a-b-The-first-and-second...
Re:Cameras and Lenses
by sudosysgen on Thursday December 10, 2020 @01:11PM
(#25376533)
Well yes but you're still going to need a sensor as large as the aperture of the lens you want to simulate, which makes it a non-starter for phones.
Re:Cameras and Lenses
by foo_barrio on Thursday December 10, 2020 @02:12PM
(#25377220)
Yea, this type of image recording has huge compromises but I personally find it really cool.
Re:Cameras and Lenses
by sudosysgen on Thursday December 10, 2020 @05:07PM
(#25379431)
So do I! If I had a bit more photography budget I'd try them out.
Also, I'm excited about cameras with dual/quad pixel AF, that are kind of a hybrid between lightfield and traditional cameras. I wonder what kind of sorcery one would be able to do with the light field data in those cameras!