Doesn’t cannibalism lead to various health issues or risks? Or does the lab-grown part fix that?
With mad cow, the cattle were fed from recycled parts of the same species, mostly organ meats (including the brain). With kuru, the prions propagate mostly through brain tissue. Those prions sometimes find their way into muscle tissue, but unless we seed the lab-grown meat with proteins which include prions, it's unlikely to be an issue.
On the second question, yes I think there is a slight difference since animals can't consent. If the question is strictly "would you rather do a biopsy on a cow or a consenting human" I'd choose the human.
I'd think most people would agree on the rule "don't hurt a person unless you have a good reason". Vegans just extend that to "don't hurt an animal (the kingdom) unless you have a good reason". And to me, informed consent free from coercion is a good reason, but taste is not.
Eating cultured meat from an animal seems no worse than normal meat, but eating cultured human meat seems straying into cannibalism. I'm sure there are reasons other than health for why this is not more popular.
I can't think why not.
Does it make a difference if the meat is cultured from a non-consenting cow, who is only briefly inconvenienced?