News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on FTC Sues Facebook for Illegal Monopolization. Parent comment

Re:FTC Sues Facebook for Illegal Monopolization by mthoms on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @07:32PM (#25367786)
Evidence? I've been in crypto a long time and have never experienced this.

I'm not saying it's never happened, but implying it's some sort of repeating pattern is simply false.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FTC Sues Facebook for Illegal Monopolization by mthoms on Thursday December 10, 2020 @01:32PM (#25376771)
You said they "tend go down for maintenance" on "any big price swings" but were only able to muster one example of one exchange going down "for maintenance" on one price swing (Bitfinex).

The others, as the articles point out, were trade volume related (which is also a problem, but much less sinister).

There's no evidence this is some kind of grand conspiracy like you implied. There's plenty to criticise in Crypto, but little evidence for what you actually claimed.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FTC Sues Facebook for Illegal Monopolization by TylerE on Thursday December 10, 2020 @01:42PM (#25376875)
You're moving the goalposts. A day when everyone is trying to get their "money" out is the definition of a high volume day.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FTC Sues Facebook for Illegal Monopolization by mthoms on Thursday December 10, 2020 @06:54PM (#25380437)
No, I'm not challenging the premise, I'm challenging your framing.

Your comment implied sinister intent: That exchanges go offline at key times in order to scam people.

No evidence was provided of that. The sources you provided point to technical problems that are perfectly understandable during a massive, unpredicted surge in such a technically complex field.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FTC Sues Facebook for Illegal Monopolization by TylerE on Thursday December 10, 2020 @09:41PM (#25381633)
There is a long history of exchanges explicitly scamming people.

Way beyond giving them the benefit of the doubt at this point.

[ Parent | on HN ]