The point is very clear. But let me clarify it: there was an effort by state actors to manipulate and aid a specific party in a way that is fully illegal.

It very likely did. The Muller report showed that it did, at least in all likelihood and given the evidence available. The report just stopped short of taking the next step, calling it proven and going forward with whatever the next step would have been.

It did so because of the very high bar Muller set himself given that the accused was the sitting president, that the DoJ under Barr claimed wrongly that the president is immune (=he were a king), and that he wanted the democratic system to act on the findings in the report.

>Volume I of the report concludes that the investigation did not find sufficient evidence that the campaign "coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_report

Sufficient for X. That's the point I made. That does not mean that the report said it did not happen. Read about the non-redacted version!

The (more recent) Republican Led Senate Intelligence Committee did find significant co-ordination - at best unwitting

To quote The Intercept:

In fact, the Senate report dismisses many of the most outrageous accusations involving Trump and Russia even as it provides overwhelming and damning evidence of Russia’s efforts to intervene in the 2016 presidential election to help Trump win and the Trump campaign’s eagerness to embrace the Russian intervention.

But the Senate report goes much further than election interference and provides the first detailed examination of the broader and complex network of relationships between Trump, his ever-shifting circle of personal and business associates, and a series of Russian oligarchs and other Russian and Ukrainian figures with ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

https://theintercept.com/2020/09/03/trump-russia-senate-repo...

Read the report yourself: https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/docu...

> it provides overwhelming and damning evidence of Russia’s efforts to intervene in the 2016 presidential election to help Trump win and the Trump campaign’s eagerness to embrace the Russian intervention.

This in no way suggests coordination.

What exactly is unwitting coordination?

> What exactly is unwitting coordination?

They were being used by Russian agents without being aware of it.