News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FTC Sues Facebook for Illegal Monopolization by gamblor956 on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @02:56PM (#25363753)
Unfortunately, after skimming through the PDF of the complaint (https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/1910134fbco...), it appears the FTC is not seeking that remedy.

It appears VR is still too small of a market for them to care about.

Re:FTC Sues Facebook for Illegal Monopolization by vosper on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @03:49PM (#25364712)
Also, Facebook doesn't have a monopoly on VR - there are several competitors in the market, like HTC and Valve.
Re:FTC Sues Facebook for Illegal Monopolization by bogwog on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @05:00PM (#25365866)
Yeah, and that might be because Valve is too expensive for them to buy.
Re:FTC Sues Facebook for Illegal Monopolization by spdionis on Thursday December 10, 2020 @02:24AM (#25370852)
Valce is also probably not for sale.
Re:FTC Sues Facebook for Illegal Monopolization by ascagnel_ on Thursday December 10, 2020 @10:15AM (#25374508)
There's also a bunch of social features embedded in the Steam client; I wouldn't be surprised if regulators took exception to any acquisition by another company with a social network.
Re:FTC Sues Facebook for Illegal Monopolization by jcfrei on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @03:52PM (#25364743)
Seems a bit short-sighted because if Oculus becomes the dominant VR platform that Facebook envisions it to be then it's going to dwarf instagram in terms of economic importance (for advertisers and users) over the long term.
Re:FTC Sues Facebook for Illegal Monopolization by freehunter on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @04:02PM (#25364924)
That's a big if, one that hinges on way too many things to be able to successfully argue in court about:

1) VR ever becoming a huge player. It might. It might not. Right now there's no real evidence that VR will actually become a big deal, and Facebook could argue that this is a niche offering that can't be anti-competitive because there's no real market yet.

2) The feasibility of VR technology independent of major vendors. There's a strong possibility that without a huge R&D budget VR will never overcome the hurdles that might keep it out of the mainstream. Facebook could argue that removing Oculus would doom VR to failure in the market.

3) The Sirus/XM merger removed 100% of satellite radio competition (there's only one vendor left after the merger), but both Sirius and XM successfully argued that the market isn't big enough to support multiple vendors. Facebook could argue a similar case, that for the health of the VR market there should be fewer competitors.

I'm not a lawyer so I don't know if any of those would be winning arguments, but based on previous anti-trust cases I've followed that would be the strategy I would expect. And it might be why the FTC didn't go down that path.

Re:FTC Sues Facebook for Illegal Monopolization by paxys on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @03:56PM (#25364796)
The flip side of it is that VR isn't mature enough for a company like Oculus to succeed independently. Having the resources of Facebook behind it will help the VR market as a whole (for now).
Re:FTC Sues Facebook for Illegal Monopolization by kossae on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @03:59PM (#25364872)
I think the FTC will deal with that as it comes. Including that in this case would be speculating the future of the Oculus business.