Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio...
by jimbob45 on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @01:48PM
(#25362443)
There was election fraud and I’m happy to link you some concrete evidence if you don’t believe me. That’s not the issue though. The issue is whether there was coordinated, systemic, and purposeful electoral fraud. That’s a much more difficult question to answer (probably a no lol). I would say that people like you who say that there was 0 electoral fraud are just as ignorant as the people conclusively saying that there was 1000% coordinated systemic electoral fraud.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio...
by throwaway894345 on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @05:03PM
(#25365902)
> I would say that people like you who say that there was 0 electoral fraud are just as ignorant as the people conclusively saying that there was 1000% coordinated systemic electoral fraud.
You seem to have misread my comment. I'm not arguing that there is zero fraud. I didn't even say in my post that there was no conspiracy (though I'll say here that there wasn't). I only said the conspiratorialists aren't arguing constructively. I'm probably pretty aligned with you--I wouldn't be surprised if there were a handful of fraudulent ballots on either side, but there's certainly no evidence for a conspiracy.
Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio...
by chillwaves on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @06:10PM
(#25366714)
We are all eagerly awaiting your evidence. You may want to call up some news outlets as well, you are about to be famous.
Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio...
by cityofdelusion on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @06:45PM
(#25367219)
To be fair, there are plenty of cases of _isolated, singular_ fraud (see the various people that tried to double vote and got caught). The OPs wording is quite deliberate.
Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio...
by whenitrains on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @04:17PM
(#25365160)
Sure - where is this link?