Serving warrants in general dangerous, point blank - and even 'white collar criminals' who don't answer the door are giving indication that something may be up.
It's 100% reasonable for the police to have their weapons upholstered at that point and well within reasonable SOP.
2) There's no evidence of corruption on behalf of the officials in Florida - this is the continued misrepresentation of some in the press, and easy echo-chamber populism.
There as an argument over how data should be represented; disagreeing with your employer is not 'whistleblowing'.
Again - Florida releases considerably more detailed information than they do in any province in Canada and somehow, everyone seems to think that we are doing 'such a great job in governance'.
The overall level of wilful ignorance on these nuanced incidents in shameful. Even so-called smart people believe what their emotional triggers and biases want them to believe.
I'm looking forward to hearing what the courts have to say about it.
> You are absolutely more likely to be shot at while serving a warrant, than working in a convenience store.
Do either of you have statistics?
> Yes it is. [1] (from the AP, not Fox News) Have a little Google yourself.
Serving a search warrant on a statistician who blew the whistle on corruption is nowhere near the same situation as serving a search warrant on drug dealers. Come the fuck on.