Re:Qt 6.0
by paulryanrogers on Tuesday December 08, 2020 @11:24AM
(#25347356)
Can you provide an example of a comment sufficiently technical to be worthy?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I'm saying there isn't one (well, a hundred messages in and there are a handful at last :) ). Nobody is discussing what's new for instance. I'd be interested in the status of moc (isn't mentioned on the page).
The MOC is still present in Qt 6.0, if that is what you are asking.
Re:Qt 6.0
by kevin_thibedeau on Tuesday December 08, 2020 @06:21PM
(#25352957)
Even with CMake?
Question should be "even with C++17?". Cmake has had moc and uic support for years now. The question is why they don't leverage the c++17 features to get rid of moc, ffs.
There is some features used by moc expected in c++23 like reflection. I think that in qt 7 they will drop moc an some stl replcements in qtcore
> Even with CMake?
Why would Cmake eliminate the need for Qt's moc? Cmake is a build system/makefile generator. You don't generate c++ from form files or Qt-annotated C++ files out of magic.