News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Qt 6.0 by izacus on Tuesday December 08, 2020 @10:42AM (#25346661)
> Seems reasonable? As long as you're getting benefit from Qt by distributing software using it you need to keep paying for it?

No, the reasonable model (as someone how's shipped commercial libraries and researched the market) is that subscription gates support and future updates. So as long as the subscription is active you get updates, patches and support. Once it passes you're kept on old version. It's fair to the seller (keeps a steady revenue stream and most customers will want to keep the subscription for updates anyway) and fair to the customer (they can't be easily extorted with price hikes and their software doesn't get sabotaged by external subscription pricing).

Re:Qt 6.0 by HelloNurse on Tuesday December 08, 2020 @12:12PM (#25348151)
The reasonable model is that the Qt company cannot be allowed to mess with the software their customers have developed and released, by requiring unexpectedly high fees or just terminating the license.

Why expect good faith and dependability with the precedent of their decision to screw KDE?