News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Qt 6.0 by FpUser on Tuesday December 08, 2020 @09:40AM (#25345703)
>"Seems reasonable?"

Maybe to you. To me it reads like: do not ever touch this tool to do anything that has even remote chance to go commercial.

Re:Qt 6.0 by toyg on Tuesday December 08, 2020 @12:00PM (#25347959)
Ironically, it’s easier if you don’t pay Qt and just use it as LGPL: ship it unmodified, distribuite Qt sources unmodified on request, and go your merry way.
Re:Qt 6.0 by FpUser on Tuesday December 08, 2020 @12:59PM (#25348967)
This is theoretical for me. I am small company and have no time/desire/money for lawyers to decipher all those intricacies of LGPL (also they say that some stuff there is GPL). I prefer to pay reasonable one time fee for permanent license and upgrade when I feel it is needed.