News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:EPA declines to tighten soot pollution standards by throwaway0a5e on Monday December 07, 2020 @08:46PM (#25340586)
The emissions technology significantly increases the TCO of the vehicle so it's not exactly surprising that people disable it.
Re:EPA declines to tighten soot pollution standards by nitrogen on Monday December 07, 2020 @09:09PM (#25340777)
It just moves the TCO to the lungs of everyone else.
Re:EPA declines to tighten soot pollution standards by throwaway0a5e on Tuesday December 08, 2020 @06:33AM (#25344003)
Why is it impossible to say <thing happens> without everyone around here reading it as <thing happens and I approve>?

My comment intentionally no value judgement yet everyone assumed one.

Re:EPA declines to tighten soot pollution standards by omgwtfbyobbq on Monday December 07, 2020 @09:35PM (#25340981)
How much does it increase the TCO?
Re:EPA declines to tighten soot pollution standards by fy20 on Monday December 07, 2020 @11:36PM (#25341862)
From a European perspective pretty much any diesel car here that has done over 200,000km will have had the DPF removed. In most countries it's illegal, but it's also not tested as part of the emissions tests (particulate matter in general is not tested, other than 'is there black or white smoke? nope, you pass').

Above this mileage it will become clogged and need to be replaced. If it isn't it will increase fuel consumption, reduce power, and damage the engine if left long enough. They are not off-the-shelf parts you can buy (not that they couldn't be, but nobody buys them), so you need to get a 'reconditioned' one which isn't going to last anywhere near as long. For €2500 or more for parts and labour it doesn't make financial sense, especially when your car is probably valued at a similar amount.

I live in a city center next to a relatively busy road and whenever I replace the filters in my apartment ventilation system every 3-6 months they are always thick black. We don't really have any heavy industry in this city, so I assume most of that is from vehicles.

Re:EPA declines to tighten soot pollution standards by sagarm on Monday December 07, 2020 @09:27PM (#25340915)
Looks like this is a problem to be solved with the application of law and order. If a few extrajudicial executions happen along the way, it's just the price we pay for an orderly society.

After all, all lives matter.

Re:EPA declines to tighten soot pollution standards by throwaway0a5e on Tuesday December 08, 2020 @06:32AM (#25343993)
Isn't it a little hypocritical to call for law and order and condone vigilantism in the same sentence?
Re:EPA declines to tighten soot pollution standards by sagarm on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @01:48AM (#25356010)
Obviously I'm being sarcastic. The extrajudicial executions are administered by the police, in case that wasn't clear.