Intel 10th gen to 11th Gen is not really that different

In many single threaded benchmarks the 11th gen is 50% faster than the 10th. I think it’s a remarkable bump. The Zen3 has also brought a significant leap in single threaded performance, but not on mobile yet.

Most consumers don't understand computer "speed," and so any of these speed claims are either 1) marketing, or 2) aimed at enthusiasts who do understand. Most people seem to think that you own a computer for a few years, and then the computer "gets slow," and then it's time to buy a new computer.

This kind of condescension isn't helpful. People understand when an app or a site is slow, or doesn't work, compared to when it works well and quickly.

I legitimately didn't intend to be condescending. In my experience people don't understand that for a computer to be "fast," you have multiple possible bottle-necks: hard drive read/write, CPU, RAM, network bandwidth, etc. My very intelligent father-in-law (I mean this seriously, he's very intelligent, and was a programmer for years.) wanted to boost his internet speed, and upgrade from DSL to cable. (something like 15mbs to 100mbs) Well, he didn't really notice much speed difference. And this was because he was seldom, if ever, saturating his 15mbs link. In fact, on a modern webpage, there are so many new TCP connections that each one can be a bit slow despite bandwidth. (and this is to say nothing of the delay incurred by actually trying to render the js and other elements on the page.)

My point was that most consumers don't understand these things, and just assume that "computer speed" is one-dimensional: it's either fast, or not fast.

Yet they use Facebook and Instagram nonetheless.

Free dancing bears and network effects will always win.