News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:She Couldn’t Open for Outdoor Dining. The Film Crew Next ... by neither_color on Sunday December 06, 2020 @04:00PM (#25326582)
Restaurants were never a major source of transmission and your industry isnt really more essential. The only fact you stated is that you get tested more, which is a good argument, but I dont really buy your anecdote that you guys go out less than anyone else and this somehow justifies your privilege. This is a very sensitive topic because small businesses feed families and are being destroyed across the country so you'll have to do better than say "We're totally more well behaved than people who go to restaurants"
Re:She Couldn’t Open for Outdoor Dining. The Film Crew Next ... by graeme on Sunday December 06, 2020 @04:04PM (#25326624)
Restaurants are majorly associated with spread. They’re unmasked, indoor environments where people talk.

Here’s an interesting report where two people were infected with just five min of overlap by an unmasked person. Extremely detailed contact tracing by the south koreans.

TV, by contrast, gets other people to stay at home in front of the TV and not be bored. A super vital service right now!

https://zeynep.substack.com/p/small-data-big-implications

Re:She Couldn’t Open for Outdoor Dining. The Film Crew Next ... by zarkov99 on Sunday December 06, 2020 @04:14PM (#25326701)
I have to object to TV being vital in any way, shape or form. Come on. Even if you accept that watching TV is somehow essential during this period, which it is not, there are enough archived shows and movies for people to watch for multiple lifetimes.
Re:She Couldn’t Open for Outdoor Dining. The Film Crew Next ... by graeme on Sunday December 06, 2020 @05:45PM (#25327382)
I mean I don’t watch new TV but I know a lot of people will choose new TV over socializing.

I love older stuff but that’s not what most people watch. You have to deal with the world as it is, not how you want it to be.

Re:She Couldn’t Open for Outdoor Dining. The Film Crew Next ... by ruminasean on Sunday December 06, 2020 @05:07PM (#25327070)
I never said we were essential. I personally don't watch tv, so I'd agree with you generally.
Re:She Couldn’t Open for Outdoor Dining. The Film Crew Next ... by neither_color on Sunday December 06, 2020 @04:07PM (#25326642)
The story in question is an outdoor dining area set up directly in front of an identical looking film crew dining area.
Re:She Couldn’t Open for Outdoor Dining. The Film Crew Next ... by graeme on Sunday December 06, 2020 @04:10PM (#25326664)
Oh I think outdoor dining is fine if not in one of those indoor tent things.

But your comment seemed about dining generally. If you only mean outdoor dining I agree that’s fairly low risk if spaced out.

Re:She Couldn’t Open for Outdoor Dining. The Film Crew Next ... by masklinn on Sunday December 06, 2020 @04:09PM (#25326656)
> Restaurants were never a major source of transmission

Restaurants were some of the earliest known sources of mass spreading locations.

Re:She Couldn’t Open for Outdoor Dining. The Film Crew Next ... by kelchm on Sunday December 06, 2020 @04:21PM (#25326771)
Restaurants with open air outdoor seating as depicted in the linked video?
Re:She Couldn’t Open for Outdoor Dining. The Film Crew Next ... by ruminasean on Sunday December 06, 2020 @05:08PM (#25327085)
I never said TV was essential. Entertainment in NY and LA feeds families as well, however. My Broadway friends who are losing their homes and apartments with no hope of work until at least June (but most likely September at least) might want a word about feeding families.
Re:She Couldn’t Open for Outdoor Dining. The Film Crew Next ... by tomc1985 on Sunday December 06, 2020 @04:16PM (#25326723)
Then perhaps all the restauranteurs ought to get together and self-regulate. An industry practicing discipline is not "justifying" any privilege. In my city, many of the businesses forced to closed in the last week due to covid violations were restaurants

Figure it out and you too can enjoy that "privilege"