News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Qualcomm Details The Snapdragon 888: 3rd Gen 5G and Cortex-X1 on 5nm. Parent comment

Re:Qualcomm Details The Snapdragon 888: 3rd Gen 5G and Corte... by Nokinside on Friday December 04, 2020 @11:18AM (#25304010)
Most of those are not CPU tests. But even in the link you provided 865+ has best performance/watt in every test in GPU Performance & Power.

Here is Nanoreview's Snapdragon 865 Plus vs A13 Bionic CPU performance tests: https://nanoreview.net/en/soc-compare/qualcomm-snapdragon-86...

(btw. My argument is not that Apple is worse)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Qualcomm Details The Snapdragon 888: 3rd Gen 5G and Corte... by whynotminot on Friday December 04, 2020 @11:39AM (#25304338)
JavaScript perf is a GPU test? I guess I'm learning new things every day.

(The link I shared is all CPU leaning performance tests.)

Nanoreview? Really dude? In the "Pro" section for the 865+ it lists two more cores (factual but largely irrelevant) and in the "Pro" section of the A13 it lists "Compatible with the latest DirectX 12.1" (laughably hilariously untrue).

I love how nano review has become the Android fan bible, despite its very obvious flaws.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Qualcomm Details The Snapdragon 888: 3rd Gen 5G and Corte... by attractivechaos on Friday December 04, 2020 @05:53PM (#25309408)
Also, the Antutu developers said scores between different OSes are not comparable: https://www.antutu.com/en/doc/119646.htm but some people just love to boast how Android is better based on Antutu...
[ Parent | on HN ]