“Building software to compete with other companies” wouldn’t be specific enough for me if I was the judge.

If you said to me “we are building a VR headset and there is a specific image technique we want to employ to correct for foveated lenses, and we want to bring in an image processing expert” then that would be different if I was the judge.

I’m not arguing what should be the case, I’m saying what I think the intent of the current law accommodates for.