Re:Colombia is considering legalizing its cocaine industry
by BLKNSLVR on Friday December 04, 2020 @04:33AM
(#25300561)
If you can own both sides of a conflict then your profit potential is huge.
This is pretty much impossible unless you're a government or a corporate with government-sized revenue and tendrils into government.
Wasn't the Iran-contra thing funded by selling crack to poor, predominantly African-American neighbourhoods in the US? Selling out their own citizens for foreign policy, or is that conspiracy theory?
Re:Colombia is considering legalizing its cocaine industry
by capableweb on Friday December 04, 2020 @06:40AM
(#25301254)
Apart from Oakland Tribune at one point writing about that the US government was selling drugs to fund arms in other countries, I don't think the whole "selling crack to poor" thing has been factually proven (yet).
That doesn't take away the fact that they sold weapons to an embargoed country in order to fund right-wing paramilitaries, which is horrible in it's own, but drugs doesn't seem to have been involved as we're seeing with The War on Drugs.
After many years on this planet, I've reached the conclusion that when bodies of people decide over other bodies of people, they don't always have their best intention for them, even if they tell you so.
The War on Drugs has not been good for anyone except for the people who been waging it. If you're in the business of making weapons, you need a threat. If there is none, you need to make up one. If you're low on criminals, make more stuff illegal. Bam, now you have a lot of criminals, and some of them armed, even better.
The dream of "War on Drugs" is not to stop drugs. It's to make money will proclaiming you're against drugs.