News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:These are called opportunities by brundolf on Thursday December 03, 2020 @02:02AM (#25286312)
> But doing the same thing should never become slower

But none of the described software is doing the same thing it was before. This author is saying "well, you know, it's still a photo editor, same thing" and "well, you know, it's still a web browser, same thing". But those are gross oversimplifications of how a major piece of software evolves over the course of a decade.

Re:These are called opportunities by saagarjha on Thursday December 03, 2020 @02:08AM (#25286358)
Perhaps, but when people are using the software in the limited capacity it would still be nice to have the "old" performance. I think people would be far more forgiving of Slack's performance problems, for example, if sending a simple text message didn't require as much RAM as a video call, or their IDE's performance if typing was as smooth as it is in vim but the complicated analysis stuff took a little longer to come in.
Re:These are called opportunities by UweSchmidt on Thursday December 03, 2020 @02:37AM (#25286542)
Sure, in all the bloat there's new functionality, some of it even useful. But if you just take a simple, well defined task, like starting a program and loading an appropriate file (any photo editor, Excel, Word...), I would expect it to load instantly.

If our hardware has sped up 1000x, couldn't the software limit itself to slowing things down only 500x instead of 2000x?

Re:These are called opportunities by annilt on Thursday December 03, 2020 @02:12AM (#25286388)
Problem is these softwares can be made as fast as they were before but instead of investing time on performance/resource usage, developers see more value on extra features. So you end up with a fully featured but slower than ideal software. Even it is slower, still in acceptable limits to the majority of users.
Re:These are called opportunities by arvinsim on Thursday December 03, 2020 @02:25AM (#25286467)
> developers see more value on extra features.

Yet another post blaming developers when it's the product managers and business development people that decide the direction of the product.

Re:These are called opportunities by annilt on Thursday December 03, 2020 @03:11AM (#25286722)
I’m not blaming developers. Indeed extra features are more valuable(for users/marketing etc.) than performance most of the time. So, it’s completely normal. More hardware will lead to more features and bloat. There is no one to blame on that.
Re:These are called opportunities by izacus on Thursday December 03, 2020 @04:53AM (#25287361)
> Yet another post blaming developers when it's the product managers and business development people that decide the direction of the product.

Developers on this very site will happily deliver a slow running JS Electron turd if that means that they don't have to learn a new tool or use the process that isn't "fun" to them. Blaming just the business owners when the developers themselves refuse to do their job well is a bit strange.

Kinda reminds me of life in my socialist state - everyone did their minimum to tick the box they had to do and then just slacked off the rest of the time. Everything was kinda shit but it's not like anyone got paid more to do a job well, amirite?

Re:These are called opportunities by AnIdiotOnTheNet on Thursday December 03, 2020 @09:26AM (#25289098)
Oh? Then can you explain why the same phenomenon happens in FOSS software?