Re:Google illegally spied on workers before firing them, US ...
by youeseh on Wednesday December 02, 2020 @04:39PM
(#25282004)
I'm guessing that you've only worked at / interviewed at large firms. They're large and your prospective role there wasn't senior enough for them to afford you special treatment.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google illegally spied on workers before firing them, US ...
by willcipriano on Wednesday December 02, 2020 @04:43PM
(#25282048)
I've only worked at small to mid sized firms. Either way, Knowing what the agreement is before I agree is special treatment? I'm not asking to modify the contract, merely to see it before I give notice and upend my families life.
Re:Google illegally spied on workers before firing them, US ...
by youeseh on Thursday December 03, 2020 @12:21PM
(#25291467)
Anything outside of what they consider to be their norm is special treatment. There aren't enough lower level people who ask to see employment agreements ahead of time.
Re:Google illegally spied on workers before firing them, US ...
by dvtrn on Wednesday December 02, 2020 @08:19PM
(#25284085)
Why is it “special treatment” to want to read what you’re about to sign when it directly involves ones means of living?
Re:Google illegally spied on workers before firing them, US ...
by ClumsyPilot on Thursday December 03, 2020 @07:58AM
(#25288378)
Surely a contract can't be valid if one of the parties hasn't had a chance to read it.
It's like if you bought a car, signed and paid, and discovered there is an extra agreement to actually use it, and that one says any ideas you have while driving belong to BMW.