OP was directly responding to:
> They've mostly given up on the idea of a clever person finding a new money-hose. They just focus on the one they have now.
The financial numbers suggest they have not given up and have succeeded incrementally towards other sources since. How else do you correct the above statement?
"More diversified than it's ever been" can be factually true here, but for the purposes of this discussion was highly inaccurate.