News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AlphaFold: a solution to a 50-year-old grand challenge in... by chubs on Monday November 30, 2020 @10:30PM (#25261982)
The answer i've read is that he _logically_ precedes it, not _temporally_. But yes that only makes a tad more sense :)
Re:AlphaFold: a solution to a 50-year-old grand challenge in... by sudosysgen on Tuesday December 01, 2020 @01:18AM (#25262892)
Hmm, I'd be interested to see how one could define logical causality without accidently defining something that has all of the properties of time!
Re:AlphaFold: a solution to a 50-year-old grand challenge in... by FeepingCreature on Tuesday December 01, 2020 @03:54AM (#25263631)
That's a distinction without a difference though.
Re:AlphaFold: a solution to a 50-year-old grand challenge in... by ben_w on Tuesday December 01, 2020 @07:55AM (#25264695)
There is a potential difference, I think.

Consider if this universe exists only as a simulation (I’ve met some theists making this category of comparison but with different language). The laws of physics are identical in both directions for the arrow of time, so the starting point of the simulation from the point one view of the outside universe can be any point in time from the perspective of the inhabitants.

In this case, the “before” in the outer universe is a logical rather than temporal one from the point of view of us inhabitants.

(Disclaimer: my philosophy qualification is really bad)

Re:AlphaFold: a solution to a 50-year-old grand challenge in... by sudosysgen on Tuesday December 01, 2020 @03:45PM (#25269656)
Well yes, from our point of view. But I'd understand that there still must be something like time from the point of view of those that wrote the simulation.