News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Violent, lively and brash, taverns were everywhere in ear... by exabrial on Monday November 30, 2020 @08:07PM (#25261081)
Agree. Remember the British were already under order to raid the towns for supplies ('powder and ball'). In Lexington, the militia had made a show of force, following which gunfire was exchanged, and the British officers authorized a "huzzah" in celebration of the death of several militia members.

Quite a stretch to call resisting an army under orders to seize munitions by force "murder" per say, this was a clear act of self defense.

Re:Violent, lively and brash, taverns were everywhere in ear... by throwaway0a5e on Monday November 30, 2020 @09:33PM (#25261643)
Even if you don't side with the militia, by any reasonably modern code of ethics and rules of engagement "resisting a uniformed army by force" is completely and totally fair game. Armies exist to project state violence. Sometimes people take them up on the offer.
Re:Violent, lively and brash, taverns were everywhere in ear... by pjc50 on Tuesday December 01, 2020 @04:10AM (#25263708)
I'd be interested to see if anyone applied this argument to Al-Quaeida in Iraq against coalition forces.