Why is Apple's M1 chip so fast?

Re:Why is Apple's M1 chip so fast? by simonh on Monday November 30, 2020 @06:51PM (#25260577)

For a manufacturer on the whole it’s a negligible issue. It’s simply a fact that Apple devices have longer average lifetimes and lower overall environmental impact than any of the other manufacturers. Hence the Greenpeace rating. If you actually care about the environment, as you claim, the choice is clear.

What you are doing is picking a single marginal factor that can make a difference in rare cases, but is next to irrelevant in practice, and raising that above the total environmental impact of the whole range of devices. That’s just absurd.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why is Apple's M1 chip so fast? by alacombe on Monday November 30, 2020 @08:32PM (#25261237)

> It’s simply a fact that Apple devices have longer average lifetimes

I've used the same desktop for the 8 to 6 years, upgrading with STANDARDIZED components over the years, and my laptop from that era still works. Heck, I've got a 18 years old thinpad still working fine.

In the mean time, two MBP died on me. Try again...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why is Apple's M1 chip so fast? by simonh on Tuesday December 01, 2020 @02:31AM (#25263204)

Do you care about the overall ecological footprint of Apple, as Greenpeace does, or only a few specific devices in particular? How do you evaluate likely future device lifetimes and ecological footprint, cherry picked statistics or manufacturer track record?

Should I take your evaluation in thus, or trust a detailed whole enterprise evaluation by Greenpeace?

[ Parent | on HN ]