So please tell me then. All Unixes have more or less the same FHS, Solaris did nothing different as..lets say BSD in the User-space nor did Irix, so tell me what did Solaris or Irix and even Nextstep fundamentally different then any other Unix?
>BeOS is 25 years older and 25 years younger than UNIX, yes modern.
Yeah lets stop here, it's getting ridiculous.
Irix had Inventor.
NeXT had the mach kernel, drivers written in Objective-C, Renderman, EOF, WebObjects, DisplayPostscript.
Ridiculous is putting up with certain clueless people online that don't have any idea of what they are talking about.
>explored the idea of Java based kernel drivers
They even made a Java OS a Browser and a Chip, we all know what a stupid decision that was, you could have say ZFS which is against the unix philosophy (one program one job) but you forgot that i think.
>Irix had Inventor.
Windows had paint, and Mac the almighty HyperCard...but that's NOT the Operating-system nor does it make any difference Unix-wise.
>NeXT had the mach kernel, drivers written in Objective-C
Ahh, now you bring the kernel argument i already brought, yeah drivers written in the beloved Objective-C (is that a feature or a User-space thing?)...you know Multics was made with EPL waaay earlier.
They are pure and certified Unixes (not NeXT, but MacOS X is/was), based on Unix ideas..basta.
Hint, it goes beyond doing CLI applications and daemons.
BeOS is 25 years older and 25 years younger than UNIX, yes modern.