Re:R number for UK below 1 for first time since August
by bb123 on Saturday November 28, 2020 @04:47AM
(#25236572)
I disagree. The UK’s economy is far more international than New Zealand’s. The U.K. ranks 4th worldwide for international travellers per capita, and New Zealand 38th. Shutting down air travel to the financial centre of the world would have been an incredibly risky move at the time. It may have been the right move in hindsight, but at the time it was far easier for the tiny island on the edge of the world to even consider doing it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:R number for UK below 1 for first time since August
by graeme on Saturday November 28, 2020 @05:23AM
(#25236740)
I don’t mean in march necessarily. But the UK never implemented testing at the border or isolation for travellers in any rigorous way.
They could have done this sometime over the summer. Going zero covid has huge economic benefits. And with testing you could let business travellers in with a modified isolation.
Re:R number for UK below 1 for first time since August
by postingawayonhn on Saturday November 28, 2020 @07:49AM
(#25237216)
It was only worth doing in March. Because there were so few cases NZ got down to zero in about 5 weeks. Once the cases numbers build up the time and economic cost to get to zero is unfeasible.
Re:R number for UK below 1 for first time since August
by lostlogin on Saturday November 28, 2020 @01:22PM
(#25239341)
> The U.K. ranks 4th worldwide for international travellers per capita, and New Zealand 38th.
If the below is the source, you’re citing an absolute, not per capita stat. NZ ranks significantly above the UK for travel per capita, and the UK population do not travel that much.
https://www.citypopulation.de/en/world/bymap/AirTrafficPasse...