News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:UVB-76 by archagon on Thursday November 26, 2020 @07:36PM (#25224592)
No? Much of it remains true, "true enough", or potentially true, unless I missed a blowout news story that invalidates this entire page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steele_dossier#Veracity_and_co...

Incidentally, I feel like I've been seeing a trickle of propaganda over the last few months attempting to outright discredit the dossier. People repeat that it's a "complete fabrication" as if it's a universally agreed-upon fact.

[dead]
Re:UVB-76 by archagon on Thursday November 26, 2020 @07:44PM (#25224637)
A bunch of speculative research by anonymous third-party sources in a Russian-language paper with little journalistic cachet is your evidence?
[dead]
Re:UVB-76 by ghayes on Thursday November 26, 2020 @08:54PM (#25224948)
We should refrain from ad hominem statements and stick to the merits of the argument. Personally, I agree with GP that Meduza doesn't really inspire confidence in its reporting here.
Re:UVB-76 by dilyevsky on Thursday November 26, 2020 @09:03PM (#25224984)
I mean it’s no cnn with their incredibly high standards i agree ;) also did you notice many links to other sources?
Re:UVB-76 by archagon on Thursday November 26, 2020 @07:53PM (#25224678)
All I see in this article is a bunch of "anonymous Twitter detectives said so-and-so". This does not feel like reputable investigative journalism to me.