News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on WSJ Responds to Safehouse Security and Anonymity.

Re:WSJ Responds to Safehouse Security and Anonymity by jameskilton on Friday May 06, 2011 @03:18PM (#2522127)
Given who we're talking about here (WSJ, thus New Corp), there's nothing they could possibly say that would make me trust their statement that sources are safe and anonymous. I mean, how many times did Fox News call WikiLeaks a terrorist organization? And now this conglomerate wants its own WikiLeaks? It simply doesn't add up. They cannot and should not be trusted.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:WSJ Responds to Safehouse Security and Anonymity by bh42222 on Friday May 06, 2011 @05:17PM (#2522516)
You don't trust them. Either the technology you are using is anonymous or it is not. It shouldn't matter who is on the other end.
[ Parent | on HN ]