News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WSJ Responds to Safehouse Security and Anonymity by mvkel on Friday May 06, 2011 @02:59PM (#2522063)
"Because there is no way to predict the breadth of information that might be submitted through SafeHouse, the terms of use reserve certain rights in order to provide flexibility to react to extraordinary circumstances. But as always, our number one priority is protecting our sources."

Define: certain rights Define: flexibility Define: extraordinary circumstances

This is less of a response and more of a reiteration. It completely belies the intended purpose of SafeHouse. No leaker with half a brain would leak something _worth leaking_ to this as long as that clause exists, period.

There are no comments on this comment yet.