Just watch the Zapruder film in slo mo (https://youtu.be/eqzJQE8LYrQ)

He gets shot in the neck, it appears to exit the front of his neck and enter the backside of the guy in the front seat (I think the governor).

He then gets the front of his head blown off, which definitely looks to be an exit wound as the front of his skull flies off and mist flies forward. An entry wound would not explode out like that. The thing that throws people off is that his head moves back when the front blows off. I think that would be a natural movement from the force of the bullet exiting and blowing off the front of the skull but you also have to remember that he had a terrible back with limited mobility. As a person who also has a bad back, if you get pushed forward to the fullest of your flexibility, you will recoil back with force.

I was raised to believe in multiple shooters but I don’t see it here. One shooter.

Then watch Penn and Teller shoot a watermelon to demonstrate the backwards force from the exiting mass.

https://youtu.be/yzyw7AcHbuY

Very useful video for this discussion. Thanks.

As per your first quote the 2nd one could be entry or exit. So why is it claimed that there was a 2nd gunman ?

Agreed. Not sure why you are getting downvoted. Concluding that there was a second shooter is like saying that "your runny nose and sore throat are definitely caused by the flu, but the dry cough could be either flu or lung cancer, so you probably have both".

Agreed. If one is an exit wound, and one is inconclusive, how does that lead to the conclusion that there are two shooters?

>so the first bullet probably came from the back, and the second from the front, from different gunmen.

That conclusion doesn't follow from the stated premises. The most basic missing premise is that Oswald was positioned (inside the book depository) behind the motorcade. See https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/58/DealeyPl... Of course, there are many other necessary premises wherein lie the interminable debate. But if you assume (as it seems the doctor did) that at least one shot (possibly a miss) came from Oswald behind the president, who was facing forward; and one shot came from ahead of the president exiting the back of his head, the scenario the doctor believed the evidence demanded; then you must conclude at least two shooters.

Yeah, and Oswald shot perfect shots with a super old WW2 rifle in less than 10s while he was an average shooter at best based on what we know from him in the army. There's enough evidence at this stage to support several shooters despite what the History books claim.

Can you cite some evidence?

S/he must have watched Stone’s JFK...

> The neck wound might have been entry or exit

I don't know why everyone is ignoring this part.

So since we have an exit elsewhere, this one was the entry.

If there were two shooters, wouldn't they have to be incredibly coordinated to shoot directly on target at pretty much the same time? Seems pretty difficult to get two shots to the head/neck from long range in the time between the first shot and the car pulling away.

> wouldn't they have to be incredibly coordinated to shoot directly on target

AFAIK sniper Swat teams do this when there are multiple targets. They coordinate through radio and shout on countdown.

Frankly I don't think it's complicated (for a pro).

The whole two shooters thing seems like the perfect thing to keep conspiracy theorists busy if you were trying to actually cover something up.

I.e. create some confusion around an unimportant detail. Instead of who ordered Kennedy dead

Also pretty pointless