blago
Hmm, I live in Southern Florida. Full time. It has the shittiest roads of any place in the US I have been and some of the highest fatality rates to go with.
Highways look like someone ran a snow plow at full speed, turning what were once scattered potholes into a continuous network of trenches making their own interstate.
This is in a state without cold weather, ice, or snow...
There are many non-0 income tax states that have vastly superior roads than FL. Does this prove anything about taxes?
This is an incredibly generous way to admit that Meta failed their pivot to VR and they will probably never recoup the tens of billions of dollars that was spent on it.
Never heard this argument before - it sounds very implausible. Do you have any studies or source for that claim?
Animation Made with Subtitles [video]
1. You assume others play dirty by default, even though we never caught them red-handed. Not necessarily unreasonable, but see 2.
2. You assume we play fair even when we are caught red-handed. You rationalize it with "it only goes to show this was the exception and look what happened after". Spoiler alert, nothing happened after, neither the courts nor public opinion shit it down.
You have to admit these two are a little inconsistent to say the least.
Although this is often the case, the style of the program can change things significantly. Here are a few, not so uncommon, examples where it starts to break down:
1. When you’re crafting algorithms, you might try to keep code blocks brief, but coming up with precise, descriptive names for each 50-line snippet can be hard. Especially if the average developer might not even fully understand the textbook chapter behind it.
2. At some point you have to build higher than "removeLastElementFromArray"-type of functions. You are not going to get very far skimming domain-specific function names if don’t have any background in that area.
More examples exist, but these two illustrate the point.
Sometimes it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place.
The curious case of the blocked window [video]
EDIT: Ah, nvm. It's truncating the result to 2 decimal places.
A new class of antibiotics is a cause for cautious celebration
Ah, we have a serial West-splainer. I emigrated when I was 24 and I speak for pretty much everybody I've known in those years. I've studied and wrote essays on the literature and the history of the region through high school and college. I speak the language and the customs.
You on the other hand seem completely oblivious to the cultural significance of Kafana, or its different incarnations throughout the region, to recognize that arguing about politics, whining about history, the Great Powers, life, and the Universe, has and still is pretty much the purpose of their existence.
> PS. Was I right about the educated professionals part, or were you a displaced person whose village was razed?
I'm having a hard time comprehending the relevance. Did the displaced people in Yugoslavia 30 years ago define the pathos of the region, which BTW is more than just former Yugoslavia, in the last 600+ years?
However, my point was that Phind's answer was worse than a No, or a hallucinated attempt would've been. By saying "Yes, here is how YOU can do it...", it left the impression that it didn't even understand the question.
I asked 5 different, and increasing explicit, variations of the following question: "Can you generate HTML and CSS for a JPG mockup I'm going to give you?"
Each time it answered along the following lines: "Sure, here is how you can create HTML and CSS from a JPG mockup. Follow this process..."
In my experience this never happens with GPT-4.
Patterns for Reactivity with Modern Vanilla JavaScript
I’m an doctor: Here’s what I found when I asked ChatGPT to diagnose my patients
"Trace amounts of formaldehyde can be found in our products"
Trace amounts sounds great, but that's open to interpretation. There are MANY guidelines by different authorities and their levels differ by more than an order of magnitude. If you take OSHA PEL as baseline you can claim trace amounts and still be pretty harmful.
"however, we do not add formaldehyde to our range."
Range? This sounds so vague it feels deliberate.
"As a precautionary measure, IKEA has phased out several chemicals that could potentially be harmful, often ahead of legislation."
They didn't say formaldehyde was one of them :-)
Also, did you ready the linked PDF? It says they don't use formaldehyde in their paint and lacquer. They didn't say anything about their glue and particle board. That's where formaldehyde is indispensable and used in large amounts.