News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A 4-month online dating experiment using 10 fictional sin... by standardUser on Tuesday November 24, 2020 @04:51PM (#25203353)
One thing women absolutely do not want are men who make sweeping generalizations about all women, based on no evidence or compelling arguments.
Re:A 4-month online dating experiment using 10 fictional sin... by candiodari on Tuesday November 24, 2020 @05:13PM (#25203575)
And women out of hand rejecting more than 95% of all males sends what message exactly? That’s not a sweeping generalisation of men?
Re:A 4-month online dating experiment using 10 fictional sin... by standardUser on Wednesday November 25, 2020 @02:21PM (#25213130)
It could be that women don't want the "top 5%", but rather are seeking men who are simply acceptable, who don't exude misogynistic tendencies, who bother to groom themselves, who treat others with respect. A tall order, considering most men are trash, including the good-looking ones.
Re:A 4-month online dating experiment using 10 fictional sin... by chillwaves on Wednesday November 25, 2020 @11:37PM (#25216843)
I strongly agree. Some might call the comment sexist, and inherently it is so, but that misses the point.

The point is we live in a society that is male dominated (sexist) and it has unpleasant effects on socialization which leaves many "normal" men to be problematic (or as you put it, "trash").

Re:A 4-month online dating experiment using 10 fictional sin... by wolco2 on Tuesday November 24, 2020 @09:26PM (#25205345)
What about other women?