News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ethereum 2.0 – Minimum deposit reached by beaner on Tuesday November 24, 2020 @04:28AM (#25196772)
> Don't forget that do not have enough to stake can pool their resources together.

That's great! And makes a lot of sense. However, it still requires locking capital. Those who do not have a lot of money, spend a much higher percentage of their money, and therefore need it to be liquid. So though pooling may reduce the effect of inflationary rich-poor inequality increases, I don't think it would eliminate it.

Re:Ethereum 2.0 – Minimum deposit reached by rglullis on Tuesday November 24, 2020 @04:38AM (#25196840)
> I don't think it would eliminate it.

Well, duh. No system will ever be perfect and there will always be costs associated with BFT systems. The question is knowing how these systems compare with one another and what kind of trade-offs are there.

It is impossible to dispute that the costs of keeping a PoS-based system is overall lower than the current state-of-the-art, yet you try to knock PoS while ignoring all the analog issues with PoW? Your cognitive dissonance is showing.

Re:Ethereum 2.0 – Minimum deposit reached by beaner on Tuesday November 24, 2020 @05:21AM (#25197126)
I'd like to continue engaging in good-faith conversation, not start exchanging barbs with undertones of acrimony.