News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Apple’s head of security indicted in Santa Clara County CCW case. Parent comment

Re:Apple’s head of security indicted in Santa Clara County C... by giantg2 on Monday November 23, 2020 @07:29PM (#25193739)
Please explain how this same scenario would work under a shall-issue scheme?

Edit: Since you wouldn't respond... denying a permit under a shall-issue scheme would require proof that they didn't meet the statutory requirements instead of providing the issuer with the ability to hide their reason behind an arbitrary excuse.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Apple’s head of security indicted in Santa Clara County C... by nl on Tuesday November 24, 2020 @07:40PM (#25204722)
> Since you wouldn't respond

I didn't respond because I was asleep (??)

> Please explain how this same scenario would work under a shall-issue scheme?

It doesn't matter: Soliciting bribes is against the law.

Everything else is just arguments about if a particular arrangement makes bribery more or less likely.

[ Parent | on HN ]