Re:Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla and the Unfortunate Implications
by siltpotato on Friday November 20, 2020 @09:19AM
(#25160619)
That sexuality of a character in a game is even known is problematic; this implies the sexuality is being acted on. I wish developers would stop exploiting the four Fs to induce us to buy, and sadly my minimal consumption of video games is only a splash against the tide.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla and the Unfortunate Implications
by leetcrew on Friday November 20, 2020 @10:53AM
(#25161580)
I don't think there's anything wrong with a video game character being gay, straight, or otherwise. for the most part, I do think video game romances are incredibly poorly done. I have not yet played a game where the romantic/sexual tension was not intensely cringey. we are still deep in the uncanny valley here. usually it's a fully optional side arc (eg, mass effect), so I can't say it's much of a problem in practice.
Re:Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla and the Unfortunate Implications
by BlueTemplar on Friday November 20, 2020 @04:09PM
(#25164982)
Baldur's Gate 2 ? Though not having fully animated 3D models (so you have to imagine it) probably helped a lot !
Re:Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla and the Unfortunate Implications
by wruza on Friday November 20, 2020 @01:41PM
(#25163454)
Some (many/most?) rp-games do not fix sexuality, allowing to choose any option available at playtime. The earliest that I remember is fallout 2 where you can play both guy and girl and marry/engage with both.
But it's unclear why you see that "sexuality being acted on" is problematic. It depends and is very situational, imo.