News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I should have loved biology by nynx on Thursday November 19, 2020 @12:43AM (#25146608)
This is a really inspiring comment. I'm an engineering student who's kind of mentally stuck between the worlds of computing and bio. I want to do research in biotech, but I'm having trouble finding the will to do it for some reason.

In a different vein, I've recently started designing a really cheap atomic force microscope, which I plan to open-source, so I think that may be a valuable addition to the bio and nanotech diy community.

Re:I should have loved biology by heisenzombie on Thursday November 19, 2020 @04:12AM (#25147647)
Planning on using off-the-shelf probes in your AFM? How cheap can you get those nowadays? I remember being worried about crashing them too often with our modest lab budget.
Re:I should have loved biology by nynx on Thursday November 19, 2020 @09:23AM (#25149732)
No, I'll be manufacturing them. There are alternative ways of making cantilevers with atomically-sharp tips. Tungsten wire, for instance, can be etched down to less than a few nanometers. And the quartz clocks in almost all electronic devices can be decapped and used as an oscillator.
Re:I should have loved biology by bergstromm466 on Thursday November 19, 2020 @03:45AM (#25147486)
> I've recently started designing a really cheap atomic force microscope, which I plan to open-source, so I think that may be a valuable addition to the bio and nanotech diy community.

I hope you do

Re:I should have loved biology by nynx on Thursday November 19, 2020 @09:59AM (#25150153)
Thank you, hopefully external validation will push me to actually complete the project.
Re:I should have loved biology by dekhn on Thursday November 19, 2020 @10:06AM (#25150234)
AFM isn't really used in biology.
Re:I should have loved biology by infinite8s on Thursday November 19, 2020 @10:32AM (#25150505)
But it is used a lot in biophysics!
Re:I should have loved biology by dekhn on Thursday November 19, 2020 @10:58AM (#25150760)
It is? I mean, that was my PhD, but I don't recall anybody ever using AFM for biology. Huh, apparently now they do.
Re:I should have loved biology by infinite8s on Thursday November 19, 2020 @11:33AM (#25151153)
Yeah lots of single molecule studies (strength of an actin filament, how much force needed to 'unfold' various proteins, etc). And this was 20 years ago when I was in grad school. Haven't kept up with the state of the art today.
Re:I should have loved biology by dekhn on Thursday November 19, 2020 @01:13PM (#25152428)
interesting. all the people doing that in my day (also 20 years ago) used fluorescent microscopes (Ron Vale) with labelled protein. I can't see how you could unfold a protein using AFM, since it's in vacuum state, although I totally understand how optical tweezers would be fine to do this in solution.
Re:I should have loved biology by nynx on Thursday November 19, 2020 @01:15PM (#25152439)
AFMs work in both air and fluid environments.