Re:Apple Agrees to Pay $113M to Settle 'Batterygate' Case ov...
by epistasis on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @07:05PM
(#25144456)
Yikes, how many phones did this affect after only a few months? That's an entirely new thing that I hadn't heard before.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Apple Agrees to Pay $113M to Settle 'Batterygate' Case ov...
by Bud on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @07:08PM
(#25144500)
Approximately zero. And obviously, those would have been covered under warranty.
The reason you haven't heard this before is that it didn't happen.
Re:Apple Agrees to Pay $113M to Settle 'Batterygate' Case ov...
by gpm on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @07:11PM
(#25144514)
Apple did not consider "my (friends) phone has been throttled because of the battery" as sufficient cause to replace the battery under warranty.
Re:Apple Agrees to Pay $113M to Settle 'Batterygate' Case ov...
by darksaints on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @07:13PM
(#25144533)
They weren't covered under my warranty.
Re:Apple Agrees to Pay $113M to Settle 'Batterygate' Case ov...
by jiggawatts on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @07:53PM
(#25144909)
It was covered under my warranty.
Either the warranty expired -- in which case it isn't a "few months", or it was within the warranty period, in which case it is covered.
Re:Apple Agrees to Pay $113M to Settle 'Batterygate' Case ov...
by darksaints on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @09:11PM
(#25145437)
Nope. Less than 8 months old. Battery was too degraded to run as normal, but didn't pass the threshold for replacement.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25144122
But don't take my word for it. RTFA. This lawsuit was settled because of the exact scenario I described.
Re:Apple Agrees to Pay $113M to Settle 'Batterygate' Case ov...
by gpm on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @07:08PM
(#25144488)
Not sure in terms of numbers, you might be able to find it if you dug through the court documents. It's not a rare anecdote though, for instance see this comment currently slightly below this thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25144122