News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple Agrees to Pay $113M to Settle 'Batterygate' Case ov... by bgirard on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @06:35PM (#25144162)
Karunamon made a very specific claim in this thread that I quoted. Your response doesn't discuss this claim. I'm interested in what data we have backing that claim.
Re:Apple Agrees to Pay $113M to Settle 'Batterygate' Case ov... by Karunamon on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @07:28PM (#25144679)
Nothing you'll be interested in, only very many stories of people taking their phones in once the throttling news dropped (IIRC, with accompanying geekbench scores showing the effect quantifiably), and being told to pound sand. A couple are downthread.

Besides, it's not as if this is a strange policy. Apple never has arbitrarily replaced phone parts by user request, even with cash in hand, unless the techs could point to a specific problem. Try walking into an Apple store today and ask for a new screen without an obvious problem.. you will not get one.

Re:Apple Agrees to Pay $113M to Settle 'Batterygate' Case ov... by johnmaguire2013 on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @06:53PM (#25144338)
Your quote mentioned "without notice", which was responded to. I would also like to see a response to this part of the quote:

> and having internal tooling that would deny a replacement (even at full retail price) if the battery was above an arbitrary health threshold (but still low enough to cause throttling).

Re:Apple Agrees to Pay $113M to Settle 'Batterygate' Case ov... by djmobley on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @07:39PM (#25144788)
I’ve described my experience of this elsewhere in the comments:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25144761