News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Librem 5 Mass Production Phone Has Begun Shipping by mamon on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @05:23PM (#25143304)
Possibly stupid question, but I'm really concerned, considering buying Librem 5 myself: what do we really know about Purism, and how do we know they are not NSA honeypot?
Re:Librem 5 Mass Production Phone Has Begun Shipping by rfvrgvegbegn on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @07:23PM (#25144624)
You don't have to trust them, everything is open and auditable.

The only black boxes like the modem are physically separated from the chip and sandboxed over USB.

If you don't trust them, format it and install your favorite distro + Posh (which is also open source ) that you downloaded yourself

Re:Librem 5 Mass Production Phone Has Begun Shipping by fsflover on Thursday November 19, 2020 @08:56AM (#25149445)
There are also x-ray pictures and schematics available, so you compare you phone with that: https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/community-wiki/-/wikis/Freque....
Re:Librem 5 Mass Production Phone Has Begun Shipping by pengaru on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @05:29PM (#25143382)
There's cause for concern re: the company/leadership/quality, but nothing remotely related to the NSA.

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Zlatan-T...

http://techrights.org/2019/10/31/purism-false-promises/

Re:Librem 5 Mass Production Phone Has Begun Shipping by lallysingh on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @11:48PM (#25146331)
From the first:

"There was never a single answer that made sense and only one answer actually ever "it will be $300 per device and some company said they would do it even if we hit only 5000 devices". You need to realize this was before we even knew what materials we will use, how the phone will look and so on. So vapor all the way."

This sounds exactly like the dev had no idea how manufacturing or investor relations goes. You need some numbers to tell investors, and you need the investment to design the phone, so you estimate. Using a price target of $300 seems reasonable.

From the second, I read it a long time ago and just skimmed it now, I read it as they hit major setbacks (perhaps because instead of rebadging existing stock they're suddenly building something new) and didn't want their money to dry up by scaring off the folks paying for the hardware.

The "raise money to build a new device with no manufacturing experience ends up taking forever, costing a lot more, and making people unhappy" story is an old one now. Kickstarter is full of these.

I don't see any evidence that there's anything going on more than inexperience here.