Re:John Resig, creator of jQuery, AMA.
by scorpion032 on Wednesday May 04, 2011 @01:19PM
(#2514511)
Regular reddit lurker; Moderator of dozens of sub reedits including r/sex, author of jquery, so many continuous regular iterations, evangelist of js at Mozilla, now at khan academy.
Re:John Resig, creator of jQuery, AMA.
by makmanalp on Wednesday May 04, 2011 @05:24PM
(#2515361)
"My favorite sub-reddits are fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu and starcraft. I read every f7u12 comic every day and I watch more casted Starcraft games than any other form of media (movies and TV included)."
Phew. And there I was thinking I was rotting my brain with such things. :)
Edit: Yes, HackerNews^H^H^Hitpick, undoubtedly I was truly thinking that because something applies to a renowned and skilled programmer, it also applies to me.
Re:John Resig, creator of jQuery, AMA.
by gkoberger on Wednesday May 04, 2011 @01:13PM
(#2514487)
JumpChat – A platform bridging mobile text messages, email, and IM communication without needing to download anything. Users can send mass messages on any of the platforms and JumpChat will send it to the platform the receiver activates. They are currently focusing on mass mobile messaging, where users can shoot off mass messages to the groups they define.
Re:John Resig, creator of jQuery, AMA.
by euroclydon on Wednesday May 04, 2011 @02:29PM
(#2514758)
I think he's a bit too bullish on Closure Compiler's advanced compilation mode. It's nice, but if you don't have an extern file for each additional third party library you use, or forget to use dictionary syntax to access properties that CC doesn't know about, your code will fail cryptically and almost silently.
Re:John Resig, creator of jQuery, AMA.
by benatkin on Wednesday May 04, 2011 @11:50PM
(#2516108)
> or forget to use dictionary syntax to access properties that CC doesn't know about
That sounds like a reason to be bullish about it to me. The more popular it is, the more people have to worry about making their code analyzable, the better it works.
Re:John Resig, creator of jQuery, AMA.
by statictype on Thursday May 05, 2011 @05:01AM
(#2516647)
Computer Science != Programming
I know more than a few Computer Science majors who are much smarter than me (I didn't do CS) and know their stuff down cold but couldn't program their way out of a paper bag.
Maybe Sal can - dude can do pretty much everything else - so he almost certainly can do those videos, but there's still a distinction there, between the two.
Re:John Resig, creator of jQuery, AMA.
by kmfrk on Wednesday May 04, 2011 @06:24PM
(#2515525)
Oh, sorry, I was ambiguous: I mean he has a BS in engineering and computer science. He's currently doing some casts on number theory, so he might very well already be on his way to touch on general computer science.
I think your suggestions are only going to be a part of the Academy far away in the future when all the basics are in order. When you watch a video, you usually have the necessary prerequisite knowledge for the material available as other Khan Academy videos. I think Khan approaches computer science the same way.
Re:John Resig, creator of jQuery, AMA.
by retroafroman on Wednesday May 04, 2011 @01:19PM
(#2514508)
It takes time for these sort of things to fill up. Looking now, 51 minutes after your comment shows that he has replied to just about every main question, with a lot of interesting (and technical) details.
Re:John Resig, creator of jQuery, AMA.
by weego on Wednesday May 04, 2011 @01:18PM
(#2514501)
You seem to forget this is the ingratitude generation, where no matter how good 99.9% of your free product is, you will get publicly flamed and belittled for the 0.1% that isn't quite what people expected.
A man. A machine.
Phew. And there I was thinking I was rotting my brain with such things. :)
Edit: Yes, HackerNews^H^H^Hitpick, undoubtedly I was truly thinking that because something applies to a renowned and skilled programmer, it also applies to me.
I would like to point out that because one person has managed to be productive with that kind of habit doesn't mean it isn't harmful.
http://techcrunch.com/tag/jumpchat/
That sounds like a reason to be bullish about it to me. The more popular it is, the more people have to worry about making their code analyzable, the better it works.
"A Framework for Mining Instant Messaging Services" http://faculty.washington.edu/ankurt/Publications_files/SIAM...
I know more than a few Computer Science majors who are much smarter than me (I didn't do CS) and know their stuff down cold but couldn't program their way out of a paper bag.
Maybe Sal can - dude can do pretty much everything else - so he almost certainly can do those videos, but there's still a distinction there, between the two.
I think your suggestions are only going to be a part of the Academy far away in the future when all the basics are in order. When you watch a video, you usually have the necessary prerequisite knowledge for the material available as other Khan Academy videos. I think Khan approaches computer science the same way.
...on the other hand, screencasts on JavaScript by Khan / Resig would be exceptionally good for the JS community.
127.0.0.1 www.reddit.com
l6.reddit.com
...its in mine too
EDIT: And this did. Funny stuff.
http://peepcode.com/