Re:"Equal pay for equal work" in remote jobs
by Dirlewanger on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @11:59AM
(#25139165)
I'm in the same boat as you, but think about this: these cushy developer jobs in the Western world are on borrowed time. FAANG companies are investing billions to teach people how to code and brand it as if it's some noble humanitarian effort when it's really just to further lower wages. When the time of FAANG companies actually offshoring key development teams comes (and it is coming), I have 0 faith the federal government will give a shit to protect US workers. So maybe a union is the best way to stop this.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:"Equal pay for equal work" in remote jobs
by asciident on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @03:03PM
(#25141738)
I heard this same narrative in 2000, and it didn't happen, in fact the opposite. If you want people to believe that more people coding leads to offshoring and thus universally low wages, you'll have to make a more convincing argument to convince us that history is wrong (and not just wrong, went the complete opposite direction).
Re:"Equal pay for equal work" in remote jobs
by JAlexoid on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @05:03PM
(#25143047)
Wealth isn't a single pie. When new engineers are trained - we bake a new cake, instead of slicing a thinner slice for your privileged position.
Re:"Equal pay for equal work" in remote jobs
by Nasrudith on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @01:51PM
(#25140736)
Wait how could Unions help against outsourcing? What do Unions do? Use strikes (withholding labor) to get concessions. What does outsourcing involve? Finding cheaper labor out of the country and laying off or firing existing workforce.
If outsourcing is the threat isn't the potentially outsourced threatening a strike kind of like responding to a mugger by putting a knife to your own throat? Except I think that might be more effective as a threat as it makes the mugger think of you as unstable and irrational.