News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:"Equal pay for equal work" in remote jobs by toomuchtodo on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @11:35AM (#25138807)
I would hope my union would support legislation and lobby to protect wages over employer profits (with employers attempting to optimize for profits by employing cheaper offshore labor). Otherwise, the first world's standard of living is going to quickly race to the median of the world.

If, as an employer, you would prefer not to adhere to strong labor protection laws in the market you desire to operate in, you are free to find markets more to your liking.

Re:"Equal pay for equal work" in remote jobs by Aunche on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @11:51AM (#25139041)
Why is it inherently better to protect one middle class job in a first world country rather than lift 2 families out of poverty in the developing world? I'm not pretending that outsourcing is ethical thing to do, but neither is opposing outsourcing.
Re:"Equal pay for equal work" in remote jobs by toomuchtodo on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @11:52AM (#25139057)
I vigorously support those with more wealth than they'll ever spend (billionaires and such, the wealthiest in the world) to take efforts to lift the poorest out of poverty. We're talking about a nation's labor policies to protect it's own citizens. Why would a nation disadvantage it's own citizens for the benefit of another country's citizens? If you're not protecting the income and ability to accumulate wealth of your citizens, this comes out of the pocket of your government's coffers for safety nets. So, at scale, weak labor policies are a wealth transfer from the middle class (that they didn't agree to) to other countries (as well as shareholders of your own country).

The richest 1%, with over $1 million in wealth, own 44% of the world's wealth, but we're going to keep chipping away at the middle class?

Re:"Equal pay for equal work" in remote jobs by Aunche on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @12:02PM (#25139220)
I'm talking about multinational corporations, not individuals or nations.
Re:"Equal pay for equal work" in remote jobs by toomuchtodo on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @12:20PM (#25139474)
As am I. I'm arguing against labor arbitrage, due to weak labor regulation and protections, as a wealth transfer mechanism by multinationals (operating in a market while outsourcing labor to another, collecting and profiting off the spread, while likely paying minimal taxes where they're domiciled).

The hollowing out of the American middle class over the last 40 years due to globalization is what the end result looks like, hence why those in the Western world should not support further globalization efforts (including outsourcing offshore).

Just like an airplane, oxygen mask on yourself first, then help those around you.

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/12/09/459087477...

Re:"Equal pay for equal work" in remote jobs by bumby on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @10:13PM (#25145804)
While I agree with your point, that linked article has a seemingly perverse way of defining middle class.

Middle class = 0.67(median household income) - 2.0(median household income)

Was there something wrong with the traditional definition of middle quintiles?