Disclaimer: this was explained to me by someone that plays the betting markets, and it could all be wrong.
Now, betting markets do have the problem where even if the bet was a "sure thing", it might not be worth betting for a ~5% gain when you account for the risk and effort related to getting the money into and out of the betting market, and I think that partially explains why the market has settled where it is. But still, this highly liquid market had Trump a pretty strong favorite on election night as well.
Can easily get 5-6 figures down on Polymarket (been adding to my position all week)
https://polymarket.com/market/will-donald-trump-be-inaugurat...
Where might one find such a market that presently shows a 10% Trump chance? It would be interesting to see what the trading volume looks like.
That being said, I've told friends to make free 5% after all those fees (before tax) and a bunch have made some beer money by betting on PA and a few other states.
This year betting markets were swamped, and continue to be swamped, by money supporting Trump. This year happened to also have a polling error that underestimated Trump's chances. Those two facts aligned together to form a situation where the betting markets seemed to better predict the election results than polls. However, based on one very strange election I wouldn't extrapolate out that betting markets are always better than polls.